For example, the tool might prefer rich text over markdown and thus receive a -1 on markdown.
1: the feature does not exist, or exists in such a manner that it is unusable.Ġ: the feature exists, but is sub-par, difficult to use, or lacks a critical componentġ: the feature exists and is sufficient for typical use casesĪ -1 on a feature is not necessarily a bad thing - it might simply not fit in the grand scheme of that tool. I'm scoring each entry on the list based on criteria that are important to me, or that I feel would be important to others when deciding between them. So when they look back and question why we, the Franklins of our generation, chose the komputer over the trusty quill and papyrus, they'll catch a glimpse into this milestone of humanity. Thus I am writing this document for the sake of posterity, in an effort to lend an unbiased opinion to future generations. The agony of decision making is nigh on unbearable. We are faced with more choices than ever for our venerable note taking medium, which is both a curse and a blessing. Yet I'm becoming the hipster I swore I would never be and falling for this new medium called a komputor. I have some 30 notebooks in my closet, begging me to fill them up. When Benjamin Franklin sat down to write in his diary what would eventually become the Gettysburg Address, he agonized over his choice of medium - stick with the tried and true stone tablet with hammer and chisel, or lend credence to this new fangled paper and pen? Here I am, 972 years later, faced with a similar decision. A Comparison & Review of Note Taking Applications
0 kommentar(er)
